JOSHUA ALLAN
The 1019 Report After setting the issue aside last month amid pushback from residents, Ste. Justine de Newton town council last week adopted the updated MRC-wide nuisance bylaw, a move that comes after a month of voiceful opposition from many residents and a few councillors in the small village to a bylaw they claim does not reflect realities of a rural community. “I think the residents were afraid of not being free on their properties or in their homes, but that’s not the case,” Mayor Shawn Campbell said in an interview with The 1019 Report. Some residents in Ste. Justine have taken issue with several articles within the harmonized bylaw, which has been adopted by town councils across the Vaudreuil-Soulanges region over the past month. Their worries mainly centre on articles banning the display of “erotic” or “hateful” content “in or on any public or private area;” a requirement to “immediately” remove all animal excrement from their property; prohibiting residents from having one or more inoperable vehicles on their property; and the ability for a municipal inspector or SQ officer to “visit and examine” properties in order to ensure compliance with the bylaw. As a small farming town, some locals have expressed concern that this bylaw does not match their rural reality and could leave them vulnerable to fines. The law exempts agricultural workers from some of the nuisances, but this exemption is only applied “in the course of their agricultural activities.” The legislation sets a harmonized standard on what is considered a nuisance across the 23 municipalities in Vaudreuil-Soulanges, facilitating operations for SQ officers. The bylaw is drafted by a committee of clerks and other representatives from all towns in the region. Town councils are free to choose not to adopt the legislation, though most do. Campbell took a moment during the March 10 council meeting to attempt to allay the concerns of his residents. This bylaw, he pointed out, has been in place across the region since 2009, and has had minor updates made over the years. The latest version of this bylaw is nearly identical to its previous version, which had been adopted in 2019. Campbell also wanted to make it clear that fines for nuisances — which range from $200 to $1,000 for a first offence — are rarely issued by SQ officers upon an initial visit. “Every time that an inspector or a police officer intervenes concerning a nuisance, there’s always an educational component,” he explained. “For example, you’re having a party, the music is loud (and) there’s a resident who complains because the music is loud. When the Sûreté du Québec shows up at your house, there will be an educational component where the police will explain that the noise is excessive.” “It’s very rare that a police officer or an inspector will issue a fine on the first visit,” Campbell continued. “There is always the educational component first; explain what happened, explain why it’s a nuisance, and if it’s recurring, after four, five times, for example, there can be a fine.” What’s more, he pointed out that instances of fines for nuisances in Ste. Justine have been few and far between since 2019. Since that time, there had been 13 fines for nuisances issued in the town. These have included instances of animals roaming free, excessive noise and one instance of a dog biting someone. Councillor Stéphane Lapointe has been outspoken in his criticism of this bylaw. To him, the fact that there have not been fines issued for the articles in the bylaw that residents take issue with reinforces the question of why these items are included in the legislation at all. “If there are so few complaints, then why do we need these regulations?” he said. Lapointe added that just because there haven’t been fines issued for things like the display of erotic content, uncollected animal excrement or residents keeping inoperable vehicles, does not mean they couldn’t be issued in the future. “Depending on the police officer who comes when there’s a complaint, depending on the neighbours that we have, people will see it like a Sword of Damocles,” he said, referencing the ancient Greek metaphor for an ever-looming threat. Lapointe had proposed amendments to the bylaw at the March 10 meeting, which would either remove or change parts. These proposed amendments were voted down by the council. Only District 3 councillor Jean Giroux-Gagné voted in favour. The council then proceeded with a vote to adopt the bylaw as-is, with only Lapointe and Giroux-Gagné voting against.Campbell does not believe fines for nuisances will be issued carelessly, explaining residents can contest unfair treatment. “If, for example, there’s an inspector that abuses (their power), the residents always have the means to issue a complaint to the municipality,” Campbell said. Local Journalism Initiative